There are fine reasons why we do it, and there are also good reasons why we require to make an effort not to do too much of it. Certainly, it is also true that our normal habit of noticing diverse patterns or tendencies among groups at times leads us to utilize stereotypes that are not statistically accurate.
Furthermore, it is being actively debated whether or not the intentions and motives of law enforcement officials should be taken into consideration when assessing the racial profiling practices.
Therefore, instead of racial profiling the use of other types of profiling may be suggested.
Racial profiling cannot be justified as it attacks the very root of society on which they are built. From its extreme form to the moderate, racial profiling is being defined as using a person's race as a factor to determine whether or not a specific person is a suspect Prejudice is the one to contain conscious intent, while cognitive bias and stereotypes may be unconscious suppositions about the criminality of different races or ethnical groups.
Innocent minorities may be portrayed to do be doing something bad. Setting prejudice aside, once police know that racial differences in propensity to crime exist it may be hard if not impossible to ignore them when estimating the probability that a person is an offender.
Many believe it disregards the American Constitution, especially the 4th and 14th amendments, and causes harm or even the Others deny it all together and say that racial profiling simply does not exist and police officers are just trying to do their job.
Racial Profiling is a very sensitive topic every individual can relate to. Several of the efficiency benefits of racial profiling, though, can be captured through the use of other screening criterion, such as country of origin a trait that should not be puzzled with race or ethnicityage, sex, and travel patterns.